Security agencies are probing explosive details emerging from the personal diary of Dr. Shaheen (name changed), a medical professional alleged to have played a central role in conceptualising a radical plot internally referred to as “Mission D-6.” Investigators say the diary reveals disturbing signs of ideological drift, online radicalisation, and covert interactions that may have pushed her toward extremist thinking.
The probe has gained urgency because several entries portray the 1992 Babri Masjid demolition as her “turning point,” a moment she repeatedly cites as the root of her grievance and ideological shift. Authorities emphasize that they are still verifying the authenticity and context of the writings.
The Diary That Triggered the Investigation
According to sources, the diary—recovered during a search linked to an unrelated counter-terror operation—contains:
-
Handwritten notes referencing “Mission D-6”
-
Mentions of meetings with unidentified individuals
-
Transcripts and excerpts of online radical speeches
-
Detailed commentary on communal conflict and perceived injustices
Officials caution that the diary does not establish operational terrorism by itself, but it offers “a window into an individual undergoing deep ideological radicalisation.”
A senior officer described it as “a mix of personal trauma, political anger, and borrowed extremist narratives.”
Origins of an Idea: Personal, Political, or Manipulated?
Investigators are trying to determine three key questions:
1. Was “Mission D-6” a real plan—or an ideological fantasy?
The term appears repeatedly but without operational detail.
2. Who influenced or guided her?
Entries mention unidentified “handlers,” “guides,” and “protectors” but without clear identity.
3. What role did online ecosystems play?
Preliminary cyber analysis shows she may have been active on encrypted messaging groups known for circulating radical content.
A counter-terror expert noted:
“Her writing shows a gradual shift—from emotional outrage to structured extremist vocabulary. This trajectory matches known patterns of online radicalisation.”
The Babri Masjid Factor: Emotion Turning into Extremism
Multiple diary entries describe the Babri demolition as a deeply personal grievance and a defining moment in her worldview. Experts emphasize that while many citizens hold emotional memories of Babri, only a small minority fall into extremist ideologies, making this case vital for understanding:
-
How personal wounds are exploited by radical networks
-
Why educated individuals can still be vulnerable
-
The need for stronger community-level deradicalisation mechanisms
The Alleged Network: Mapping the Web
Investigators are scrutinizing:
-
Phone and messaging records
-
Travel logs
-
Financial transactions
-
Possible overseas links
-
Code names and cryptic references found in the diary
One source said the entries hint at “a mentor figure” who may have supplied ideological content and emotional reinforcement.
Community Leaders Urge Caution and Responsible Reporting
Given the communal sensitivity, both community representatives and officials have appealed for restraint in media coverage. They urge:
-
Avoiding speculation
-
Preventing misinformation
-
Treating the matter strictly as a security case
-
Respecting due process and maintaining peace
What Happens Next?
Investigators are currently:
-
Verifying all claims in the diary
-
Identifying people mentioned through code names
-
Checking for links to banned organisations
-
Determining whether “Mission D-6” was operational or merely rhetorical
Officials stress that no conclusive determination has been made.
A Larger Warning: Radicalisation Has New Pathways
The case highlights a growing challenge: radicalisation no longer fits old patterns. It can reach educated professionals, thrive in encrypted digital spaces, and leave behind fragmented clues—like the pages of a private diary.
As the investigation continues, security agencies say they are committed to tracing every thread—from ideology to influence, from grievance to possible action—to prevent vulnerable individuals from being drawn into violent agendas.
